You will be subscribed as a member of OpenSci.World for a duration of one year. You will have the option to continue your subscription as long as OpenSci.World operates.
You will get an email at OpenSci.World
OpenSci.World keeps the right to end your membership in case you do not comply to the rules or you hurt the reputation of OpenSci.World, their members and their founders. If that happens, OpenSci.World will refund the membership amount you paid for the current subscription period.
OpenSci.World is not responsible for any of your claims and actions under your affiliation with OpenSci.World.
OpenSci.World does not claim any intellectual property rights or ownership in your work and will not get in conflict with any licensing claims of any third party.
OpenSci.World does not offer ethics reviews of your research. You are solely responsible to comply to the current ethics requirements. For example, in Canada, before you start a research with human participants or data of human participants, you must take and pass the following course: https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html. Similar certifications are available in the countries where you are conducting your research. This is not obligatory for your membership with OpenSci.World.
OpenSci.World is proud in all its members scientific work and publication, and with your specific permission, we will enlist the references of your published manuscript on our website.
As per your discretion, OpenSci.World would like to be informed when you submit a paper to a journal, including the title, or if you are comfortable - your abstract.
In OpenSci.World we would like to learn about the results of your submissions. Don't be shy or disappointed if/when your paper is rejected - the founders of OpenSci.World had a record of15 rejections across 2+ years for a single paper (that was eventually accepted and published). At least we can cope with you and provide a few words of encouragement to persist and continue. We have learned that the rejections are great opportunities to learn and improve the manuscripts. Also, not always the reviewers are correct - sometimes they are thinking inside the box and cannot see the progress. Most of the time the topic of you paper is not fit with the scope of the journal, so the rejection is not a token of the merit of your manuscript. Again, sharing these details with us is optional but preferable.
The founders of OpenSci.World (as a branch of BrainExperiments.com) went through years of hardship before they figured out all the details that allowed them to establish this non-profit and successfully engage in the World of published science. Feel free to send us questions on every step you take and about any barrier that impedes your scientific progress. We cannot guarantee the answer, but we promise to try in helping as per our knowledge, experience and available time.